rallamajoop: (Guilty Gear)
[personal profile] rallamajoop
I’m having this rather horrifying revelation about Overture.

It’s taken a couple of days of being irritated at the game for having the nerve to exist at all and gradually hunting through the web for answers to all the really difficult questions about just what we were supposed to think was going on. However, if you can somehow put aside the fact this game is simply incapable of fitting into the canon we know, has graffitied over my favourite pairing and hardly even let my favourite characters interact on screen, then I’m stuck with this nasty little conclusion about the story.

I enjoyed it.

See, almost all the problems with Overture come from the fact it’s set in a poorly defined AU. AUs don’t have to be such a mess – they did a great job with the one from the Side Red/Side Black drama CDs. The big difference is that by the end of the CDs, we knew exactly when, how and even why the timelines had diverged. On the other hand, the best we can say about Overture is, “it sort of seems like it was probably supposed to diverge around GGX somewhere or something?” Except how that still doesn’t make any sense. Maybe there’s a way of fitting it into the continuity after GG1 with a lot of effort, but they haven’t told us how, and it’s a bit unfair to expect fandom to fill in a gap that big.

Making things worse, it’s a whole different style of story, so it doesn’t even feel much like it’s part of any world we know. The only way I can get it to work at all is to assume it’s set in a world that’s completely AU, and the only things it shares with the main timeline is some of the world history and a couple of characters (and lets just say it also helps an awful lot if I patch in one of my new set of crack Sol/Ky theories to make my inner yaoi fangirl stop whinging). But if you can get it far enough that you’re looking at it basically as a story in its own right, with only minimal connection to do with the main GG canon… then I’m stuck on this problem that I did actually enjoy the story.

There are three fantastic new characters, and a new villain who I wasn’t so impressed with, but who had some interesting stuff in her own backstory. The story was full of unexpected twists, but a lot of good stories are, and once you’ve got your head around what was going on, most of the pacing and development worked pretty well. There was some very interesting development to the world – a colony of sentient Gears, a lot of new information about the theory of magic, some tantalising hints about Justice’s backstory. Sol never entirely feels like the Sol we know thanks to that voice, but damn if it wasn’t fascinating seeing him actually doing the Frederick thing for once and talking science for so much of the game. Complicated as it was (so help me) I even liked all the magical technobabble they kept throwing around. And at the end, they did leave me at least generally curious about what would have happened next.

If they ever actually got to make a GG3, anyway, which doesn’t look likely with the sales figures I’ve seen for GG2 . According to VG Charts, Overture only sold 5000 copies in its first week, and has gradually crawled its way up to around 8000 since. I’m no expert, but for a game which sells for around $70 and built for a 7th gen console, I can’t imagine that’s even going to be close to covering their development costs, let alone turning a profit. For comparison, Accent Core (which wouldn’t have had a fraction of the cost to make) sold 33,000 copies in its first week in Japan, and was up to 45,000 by the time sales had dropped off; Slash sold over 75,000 total and XX nearly 160,000. Clearly ‘more new content and story’ = ‘more sales’, but ‘leaping completely out into uncharted territory’ = bad idea. There were supposed to be plans for an English version, but I wouldn’t be surprised if even that’s fallen through with the game doing so badly. A bunch of story mode videos on youtube might well be all we ever see of GG2 over here.

So, I’m not going to try to say everyone needs to give it another chance, because the fact remains that it is one hellish mess of continuity problems, and people can’t be expected to just ignore all that – it’s a pretty major flaw (and even then, it’s not going to be everyone’s kind of story). But at least it’s restored a little of my faith that when AC+ comes out, we’re not going to discover they’ve completely forgotten how to write out a coherent storyline and have turned even our main canon into canon soup.




While I’m here, you know what? I can come up with a plausible AU timeline which makes the discrepancies from Overture make sense. It just doesn’t work the way they seem to want us to think.

The idea is that the timelines diverge before the war ends. Sol never steals the Fuuenken and never leaves the Order. Somewhere between that and the end of the war, Ky finds out about his Gear nature and past, and however the detail might work, that leads to them settling their differences. Sol’s still looking for That Man after the war though, so they go their separate ways, just on much better terms than they would have otherwise.

Illyuria could be a kingdom founded after the war ended. Ky would be an obvious candidate for king – he’s the heroic commander who saved the world and he’s a natural leader. Since he’s one of very few who knows enough about Sol’s past to realise Gears aren’t always evil, it’d make perfect sense that he’d get involved when he heard maybe-Dizzy had shown up and offer to keep her existence secret by hiding her in Illyuria. (There’s not so much I can do with the part with Ky falling for her except shrug, shake my head and make sure the AU stamp on this world is so big it’s visible from space. But aside from that, it could all fit.)

Trouble is, that’s not what they want us to think happened. In attempt to give GG2 some legitimacy, they’ve told us it’s a direct sequel to GG1 and doesn’t become AU until around GGX. All that despite the fact there’s nothing I’ve seen story-wise to connect GG2 to anything that actually happens in GG1, and a whole lot that contradicts. I have a feeling they went and forgot that GG1 had a story at all.

It’s a shame though. Gameplay problems aside (which I’m not in a position to comment on since I haven't actually played it), there’s really not that much they would’ve had to change about Overture to fix most of what turned me and so much of fandom against it.

Date: 2008-01-19 10:36 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rallamajoop.livejournal.com
Heh, I know what I'd chose because I'm shallow and the game is not mine and I'm yaoi-deprived. >_______> In one of my own stories, I'd never sacrifice coherence to something like this, but Overture made me go into Sol/Ky withdrawal. So I'd have to fix that first of all.

And I can't say I'd blame you. ^^; (Quite apart from anything else, that angle would have been pretty easy to fix, whereas fixing up the rest of Overture's plot holes might well be impossible.)

I've seriously got no idea whether Ishiwatari thought he'd improve the game's sales by wiping the gay subtext or whether he somehow decided it was necessary to the story, it's all just so completely nonsensical from start to finish. It does suck on so many levels though. I mean, hell, it's not like we're campaigning for gay rights by enjoying our slash or anything, but seeing them throw away this major (even if technically subtextual) aspect of the relationship between the two main characters and then seeing half the fandom cheer hurts. And they've done it in a way that's so confusing I don't even know what to make of it. :/

It's like... some of the over-the-top female fanservice in GG really isn't a selling point for me, but it's so much part of the game that if they ever released an installment which was fanservice free, I'd feel a bit gipped, y'know? It wouldn't be the same series without it. But clearly a lot of the male portion of GG fandom doesn't see it that way if *my* fanservice goes missing. It's a bit depressing to see people celebrating the game changing when you liked it the way it was.

I mean, where does this inherent fear of anything other than heterosexuality come from? Is a heterosexual male's security in his identity so frail that he constantly needs to affirm it in every way? It makes me wonder.

I'm probably getting a bit far into Serious Business subjects here, but I've seen it pointed out before that there's this thing in our society where guys are set up so they pretty much have to spend their whole lives proving their heterosexuality. Sadly, I think it all comes back to the warped idea that male > female, because it's all fine if a girl wants to act a bit boyish (she's only being *better* than female, see?), but if a guy starts acting remotely feminine, that's not on. Blame it on society.

On the one hand, they call anything that is not a studly demonstration of maleness or heterosexuality "gay". On the other hand, they immediately turn around and assure their surroundings that THERE IS NO GAY and they ARE NOT GAY FOR STATING THAT THERE IS GAY.

XD Strangely beautiful, isn't it? And on the upside, at least that means we can still get a good laugh out of them.

Profile

rallamajoop: (Default)
rallamajoop

March 2024

S M T W T F S
     12
3 456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Links

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 26th, 2026 06:32 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios